This commit is contained in:
parent
239e3bbdd7
commit
0b97f06afe
@ -7,6 +7,22 @@ A log of changes to the burble.dn42 network.
|
||||
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
## 10th April 2021
|
||||
|
||||
The b.recursive-servers.dn42 DNS resovler is running an experimental build
|
||||
of pdns-recursor to test a fix of [this issue](https://github.com/PowerDNS/pdns/issues/10263).
|
||||
Please let me know if you spot any strange problems.
|
||||
|
||||
burble.dn42 websites are now using a TLS certificate issued by the
|
||||
[DN42 ACME](https://acme.dn42) service.
|
||||
|
||||
A number of significant changes have been implemented for the global route collector
|
||||
- Downstream peerings have been stopped, in favour of parsing the MRT dumps
|
||||
- The collector has moved from de-fra1 to fr-rbx1, where bandwidth is no issue
|
||||
- A special routing policy has been implemented for the collector to encourage traffic
|
||||
to go directly to fr-rbx1 and not transit through burble.dn42 nodes. See also the [Routing Policy](/network/routing-policy/#collectordn42) page.
|
||||
- Internal rate limits on BGP sessions have been relaxed
|
||||
|
||||
## 3rd April 2021
|
||||
|
||||
The collector is now using a TLS certificate issued by the
|
||||
|
@ -48,5 +48,24 @@ med = (latency between nodes in ms * 10) + (500 per hop)
|
||||
The med metric is exported to external peers to help them decide how to route traffic to the burble.dn42
|
||||
network.
|
||||
|
||||
## collector.dn42
|
||||
|
||||
The global route collector is treated as a special case and does not follow the normal routing policy.
|
||||
The objective of the collector policy is to steer traffic directly to fr-rbx1 and reduce transit of GRC
|
||||
traffic over the burble.dn42 network. This is aggressively implemented for certain low bandwidth nodes
|
||||
to prevent any GRC traffic going through these nodes.
|
||||
|
||||
To accomplish this, each node announces the GRC prefix in to DN42 with different levels of path prepending
|
||||
depending on the available bandwidth of that node. Some nodes with low bandwidth allocations do not
|
||||
announce the GRC prefix at all.
|
||||
|
||||
| Node capability | Action Taken |
|
||||
|:---|:---|
|
||||
| fr-rbx1 | Prefix announced without any prepending |
|
||||
| Other nodes with unlimited BW allowance | ASN prepended once |
|
||||
| Nodes with BW limits | ASN prepended twice |
|
||||
| Nodes with low BW limits | GRC prefix not announced |
|
||||
|
||||
As well as the external traffic engineering, the internal mesh policy also prevents transit of GRC
|
||||
traffic via low bandwidth nodes.
|
||||
|
||||
|
Loading…
x
Reference in New Issue
Block a user